|
Purpose
The State Plan coordinates planning
activities and establishes statewide planning objectives in the
following areas: land use, housing, economic development, transportation,
natural resource conservation, agriculture and farmland retention,
recreation, urban and suburban redevelopment, historic preservation,
public facilities and services, and intergovernmental coordination
(NJSA. 52:18A-200(f) ).
Information
Sources
State Government
Other Organizations
working on smart growth issues
Background
The 1987 State Planning Act extended regional planning to the
entire state by calling for the creation of a State Development
and Redevelopment Plan. The State Planning Commission adopted
the first Plan in 1992 after a unique consensus building process
that coordinated state, county and municipal recommendations on
land use and infrastructure. The Commission revised and readopted
the Plan in 2001 and a new edition is planned for 2007.
The State Planning Act mandated
that the Plan achieve a series of quality-of-life and economic
goals for the benefit of the whole state. The State Plan designates
where growth should go and what areas should be preserved.
The
State
Plan Policy Map identifies areas for growth, limited growth,
agriculture, open space and conservation as required by the State
Planning Act. The map integrates the two major planning concepts
of the Plan, Planning Areas and Centers and Environs. The map
delineates five major planning areas:
-
Metropolitan Planning Area (PA1)
-
Suburban Planning Area (PA2)
- Fringe
Planning Area (PA3)
- Rural
Planning Area (PA4), and Rural/Environmentally Sensitive Planning
Area (PA4B)
-
Environmentally Sensitive Planning Area (PA5)
“Smart
Growth,” which promotes development in centers with
existing public transit and other infrastructure and protects
open space and natural resources, is a primary goal of state planning.
The Act did not require municipal compliance, but the Plan affects
non-municipal land use and infrastructure decisions. Subsequent
rules and regulations of other state agencies, such as those of
the Council on Affordable Housing (COAH), are moving toward mandatory
compliance with the State Plan by municipalities.
Cross Acceptance
is the State Plan consensus building process. To initiate the
process of a State Plan revision and update, the State Planning
Commission issues a Preliminary Plan and a Preliminary State Plan
Policy Map as well as a Cross-Acceptance Manual. All municipalities
in the state are asked to file a Cross-Acceptance report with
their county. In this report, the municipality reviews its own
land use plans and compares them to the goals and objectives of
the State Plan and the Policy Map and notes any inconsistencies.
The municipal reports are combined into a county Cross-Acceptance
report and the county then becomes the "negotiating entity"
with the Office
of Smart Growth (OSG), which is the staff of the State Planning
Commission. The OSG staff meets with each county's planning staff
to negotiate any inconsistencies and then a public hearing is
held in each county. A municipality that disagrees with the county
report can also file a dissenting report directly with the OSG.
More information about the Cross-Acceptance
process and any currently scheduled hearings can be found on the
state website: http://www.nj.gov/dca/osg/plan/crossacceptance.shtml
Plan Endorsement
is the process undertaken by municipalities, counties or regional
entities to have their master plans endorsed by the State Planning
Commission. Since New Jersey is a “home rule” state,
implementation of the State Plan relies on municipal cooperation.
Municipal compliance with the State Plan is determined through
a Plan Endorsement petition process. A municipality submits a
petition, which includes all of its planning documents, to the
OSG, where it is reviewed in concert with other state agencies
for conformance with the State Plan.
More information on Plan Endorsement
can be found on the state website: http://www.nj.gov/dca/osg/plan/endorsement.shtml
Current
State Plan Cross-Acceptance Schedule
The State Planning Commission
(SPC) has extended the period of Cross Acceptance with the counties
and delayed the publication of a new State Plan by several
years. Publication is currently expected in 2008.
-
All Final Cross-Acceptance Reports received: July 2005
- Negotiations
between SPC and County Planning Boards: completed in September
2007
The next steps will be:
-
SPC adopts Statement of Agreements and Disagreements
- SPC
distributes Draft Final State Plan and Draft Infrastructure
Needs Assessment (INA)
-
SPC distributes Impact Assessment (IA)
- Six
Public Hearings on Draft Final State Plan and Draft INA
·
- County
and municipal written comments on Draft Final State Plan and
Draft INA: Due within 30 days after the last public hearing
- SPC
adopts Final State Plan and Final INA
Revised dates for the next steps
have not been announced yet. Once scheduled, the dates can be
found on the Office of Smart Growth web-site and ANJEC will post
them here as they become available.
Involvement
Opportunities for Environmental Commissions and Citizens
Environmental Commissions play
an important role in the state planning process. As keepers of
the municipal Environmental Resource Inventory (ERI), which should
be the basis of land use planning in the municipal master plan,
a commission should participate in Cross Acceptance. Commissioners
can review the municipal Cross-Acceptance reports as well as the
county report to ensure they accurately reflect the environmental
conditions in their town. Commissioners can use information generated
by the planning process and, in turn, inform the process by utilizing
the ERI as a database in delineating Planning Area boundaries
and Critical Environmental Sites.
Commissions also can participate
in discussions on how the goals of the State Plan can be met through
local action.
The environmental commission
(EC) should also be involved in the process of petitioning for
Plan Endorsement. An up-to-date ERI is a required element of the
petition. The commission needs to be aware of municipal petition
plans and should undertake steps necessary to review and update
the ERI in advance. The planning board and EC should review local
master plans and ordinances to determine any obvious inconsistencies
with the state policies and planning maps. As keeper of the environmental
resource data, the EC should be prepared to recommend potential
Critical Environmental Sites (CES) or Historic and Cultural Sites
(HCS) designations in the State Plan.
Once municipal petitions are
underway, the EC should have a representative on the town’s
Plan Endorsement committee or be a partner to that committee to
ensure that it considers environmental resources in all plans
submitted to the State Planning Commission.
11/07
|