LIMESTONE/KARST AREAS IN THE NEW JERSEY HIGHLANDS

 

David Peifer

Project Director

Association of New Jersey Environmental Commissions

(973)539-7547

10/26/06

 

Problem: 

Substantial areas of the New Jersey Highlands area are underlain by what are known to geologists as carbonate rocks.  These rock formations, consisting primarily of limestone, dolomite, and marble have unique characteristics that require  responses from the Council at both the policy level and in specific technical guidance to municipalities. 

 

Widespread Presence in the Highlands

According to NJDEP, (appendix A, RSIS Standards), 59 of the 88 municipalities within the Highlands region contain carbonate rocks.  Eleven of these are in Hunterdon County.  Fourteen are in Morris County.  Four are in Passaic County, three are in Somerset.  Eight are in Sussex and 19 are in Warren.  Far from being an isolated geologic condition, the widespread presence of carbonate rocks in the regulated area indicates that their presence is a matter of regional concern worthy of the Council’s attention.

 

Subsidence and Sinkhole Formation

Areas underlain by carbonate rock may contain surface depressions and open drainage passages making such areas unstable and susceptible to subsidence and surface collapse.  As a result, the alteration of drainage patterns, placement of impervious coverage, grade changes or increased loads can result in land subsidence and sinkhole formation. 

 

Groundwater Concerns

Fractures and solution openings in these formations result in the rapid downward flow of surface water to aquifers.  In carbonate rock areas this condition can lead to rapid and extensive pollution of groundwater. 

 

Additionally, due to the voids and solution channels present in these formations, there may be a large amount of groundwater present in a rapidly moving aquifer. Groundwater flows through these underground channels as if were in pipes.  In situations where the carbonate rock is overlain by permeable materials, such as glacial sands and gravels, high yielding aquifers may be present.  Examples if these conditions are present at the Allamatong Wellfield and the Flanders Valley Wellfield (Morris County MUA).  These prolific aquifers have extraordinary significance as water supplies and are extremely vulnerable to contamination. 

 

Surface Water Inter-relationships

These aquifers contribute large quantities of base flow vital to water supply during drought.  These flows are significant for ecologic reasons.  In particular, these flows contribute to the maintenance of stream temperatures within the proper range for trout reproduction and maintenance. 

 

 

 

Scenic Qualities

In addition, carbonate rock areas often contain specialized scenic developments with unique topographic features and offer opportunities for outdoor recreation.  More commonly, they occupy valley bottoms, producing dramatic contrasts in relief and valuable scenic vistas, especially when viewed from the higher elevations of the ridges.

 

Known Problems

Lack of understanding of the location, character and values of these formations has lead to serious consequences worldwide and within the Highlands region.  Among the negative consequences experienced are:

 

·        Collapse or subsidence of structures, including buildings, roadways and underground utilities. 

·        Contamination of groundwater from agricultural operations.

·        Contamination of groundwater from septic systems.

·        Contamination of groundwater from hazardous materials.

 

II.  Policy Issues

 

Steep Slope Avoidance

Because carbonate rocks weather more rapidly that the older, precambrian rock that underlies the ridges of the Highlands, they are found in the valley bottoms.  These areas generally have low relief and a flat topography, making them attractive to development. 

 

·        Traditional environmental planning practices of avoiding steep slopes tends to favor development in carbonate rock areas .

 

Wetland and Surface Water Avoidance

Because groundwater recharge is relatively rapid, in many cases few surface waters or wetlands are present in carbonate rock areas.  Although large amounts of groundwater are present, little is visible on the surface.

 

·        Applying environmental planning that avoids wetlands and surface waters tends to favor development in carbonate rock areas. 

 

Application of the Nitrate Dilution Model

Application of a nitrate dilution model usually results in smaller lot sizes in carbonate areas since because the dilution equations favor smaller lots where more groundwater is present.  This has the potential to “load” the best aquifers in a region with more development.  Development of these aquifers today will compromise their utility as water supplies in the future

 

·        Application of nitrate dilution model policies tends to favor the most intensive development (using septic systems) on the valuable carbonate aquifers

 

 

 

Farmland/Agriculture

Highly productive agricultural soils (Class II or Class III) often overly carbonate rock, having weathered from the parent material in place.  Protection of “prime farmland” as a policy objective will favor farming as a use in these areas. While preserving the land is a desirable goal, the agricultural practices employed should recognize the critical nature of the underlying geology. 

 

·        Agricultural activities, favored by “prime farmland” preservation approaches, do have the potential to contaminate the underlying groundwater, rapidly entering the groundwater through sinkholes and solution channels.

 

Transportation Criteria

Due to the gentle topography and low relief typical of carbonate areas, transportation systems, especially roadways and railroads historically tended tend to follow the gentler topography of the carbonate rock formations.  In the Highlands this has resulted in a N.E.-S.W. trending pattern of transportation routes. 

 

·        Planning policies that favor proximity to transport as a desirable condition for growth may select for carbonate geology.

 

Stormwater Management

Concentrating stormwater run-off on carbonate rock areas can induce “sink-holing” and subsidence.  Attempting to induce recharge without an understanding of the constraints of the sub-surface geology can have negative impacts on water quality. Current stormwater policies that favor induced recharge can have disastrous consequences in carbonate areas. 

 

·        Stormwater recharge approaches should be carefully screened and selected prior to approval.

 

 

RSIS Inadequacy

RSIS regulations 5:21-1.6 (Development Over Limestone Geologic Formations) recognizes the importance of proper planning and standards.  However, the RSIS defers specific ordinance development to each municipality.  Specific ordinances “shall be referred to the technical committee and recommended to the Site Improvement Advisory Board for approval”.  This approach is cumbersome and will result in case by case decision making and differing and possibly incompatible approaches throughout the region.

 

·        The council should prepare a model carbonate geology ordinance using existing work and require adoption during the conformance process in the 59 towns that contain carbonate rock.   

 

 

 

Policy Summary

In sum, traditional “critical areas” planning has the potential to select carbonate rock areas as “suitable or desirable” for development.  Without a clear policy recognition of the critical value of these resources future water supplies and important ecological values will likely be compromised.  From a regulatory perspective all surface activities have at least some potential to harm the resource and, if improperly conducted, may result in severe impacts on private and public property such as buildings, underground utilities and roads, scenic character and water quality.   Other land uses, such as agriculture, conducted without consideration of the resource, will also risk contamination.

 

 

III.           Suggestions for the Council

 

·        Establish a policy statement in the RMP that recognizes the critical nature of carbonate rock formations, including, at a minimum, their values as:

o       Water supplies

o       Agricultural lands

o       Scenic resources

o       Ecological  values and:

 

Recognizes the critical nature of these areas, including;

o       Sensitivity to subsidence and collapse.

o       Sensitivity to contamination from all surface activities

o       Contribution of base flow

 

·        Map carbonate rock areas (and areas that contribute water to them) on the Land Capability Map and classify them as “critical areas”.

 

·        Prepare a model carbonate rock ordinance and require its adoption as part of plan conformance based on the model developed by NRCS (attached)